Obama Deploys Scripture to Justify Same-Sex Marriage Stance; Church Objects

Image

The dust has hardly settled on President Obama’s move to support same-sex marriage. Indeed, it’s an issue that’s likely to linger on through the 2012 presidential elections and beyond.

The Assemblies of God is voicing its dissent and objection. George O. Wood, AG general superintendent, says the denomination is in complete disagreement with the president’s new position and takes exception to Obama taking Scripture out of context to defend his position.

“[Michelle and I] we are both practicing Christians and obviously this position may be considered to put us at odds with the views of others. But, you know, when we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the Golden Rule, you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated.

“And I think that’s what we try to impart to our kids and that’s what motivates me as president and I figure the most consistent I can be in being true to those precepts, the better I’ll be as a dad and a husband and, hopefully, the better I’ll be as president,” Obama told ABC News.

Wood explains his position: “The Bible clearly teaches that marriage should be a lifelong commitment between one man and one woman,” he says. “There is no affirmation of homosexual behavior found anywhere in Scripture. However, the Bible is replete with evidence that homosexual behavior is immoral and comes under the judgment of God. Although it has become popular to quote Scripture grossly out of context to serve a personal or political agenda, it still doesn’t change what God’s Word clearly states.”

Wood adds that in light of what Scripture says, Christians should not be surprised by individuals and groups twisting Scripture, citing 2 Timothy 4:3, “For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear” (NIV).

In the Assemblies of God’s official position paper on homosexuality, it states: “We believe, in the light of biblical revelation, that the growing cultural acceptance of homosexual identity and behavior, male and female, is symptomatic of a broader spiritual disorder that threatens the family, the government and the church.”

The paper also states: “Not only do the Scriptures condemn more flagrant examples of homosexual violence and promiscuity, they also provide no support for the popular modern idea that loving and committed homosexual relationships between two long-term partners are morally acceptable. Homosexual activities of every kind are contrary to the moral commandments God has given us.”

Wood adds that it’s important for Christians to not underestimate the implications of a pro-homosexual, pro-abortion president, and what it means for the church.

“In no time in our nation have we ever needed to pray more for our political leaders and this country than we need to today,” he explains.

CharismaNews

Soldiers arrest suspects over ritual murder in Aba

Soldiers attached to the Abia State Forward Operation Base (FOB),  144 Battalion of the Nigerian Army, have arrested two men at Abayioma community in Obingwa Local Government Area in connection with investigations over a case of ritual murder.

The suspects, both in their early 30s, had allegedly conspired to abduct Kenneth Chimezie, 6, and Prince Chimezie, 4, children of one Chimezie Nwaoha. Daily Sun gathered that the two kids whose parents hailed from Nbawsi in Isiala Ngwa South Local Government Area but based in Abayioma were going to school last Monday when the suspects abducted them.

It was also gathered that the men after abducting the two kids, carried them into a palm plantation adjacent to their school and allegedly killed them. After allegedly removing the kids’ vital organs, they were buried in a shallow grave in the adjoining bush.

When school closed for the day and the two younger sisters of the victims arrived home without their brothers, their mother, who was pregnant, became apprehensive and alerted her husband. The husband, Chemezie Nwaoha, who works in a private clinic as an ambulance driver, immediately returned home and the search began.

The police and traditional ruler of the community, Eze Friday Obioma Alozie were alerted to the incident. However, in the evening, one of the alleged killers of the boys, who it was reported spent greater part of the previous day with the kids and their parents (as they were family friends), came to inform the father of the children that his kids were kidnapped and that he could help locate them. He demanded from the bereaved father an undisclosed sum of money to contact the kidnappers and facilitate the release of his children, of which the man agreed.

Instead, Nwaoha made straight to the army camp at Ngwa High School where he lodged a formal complaint about his missing children and what transpired between him and one of the suspects. Soldiers led by the officer- in-charge of the FOB, Captain Chris Nwogu stormed the home the suspect at Abayioma and arrested him. He, in turn, implicated another member who was also arrested and together, both men led soldiers to where they killed and buried the kids.

When the bodies were exhumed, it was discovered that all their vital organs including brains had been removed. The suspects were promptly arrested and taken to the army camp while the exhumed bodies were handed over to their father.

When Daily Sun visited the Abayioma home of the Nwaoha’s, the house was firmly locked as the man and his wife were said to have taken the corpses to their hometown at Isiala Ngwa for burial. The slain kids’ school at Abayioma was deserted when our reported visited the area as the teachers and pupils were yet to recover from the shock.

When contacted, the Commanding Officer, 144 Battalion, Lt. Col. Tonye Minimah, promised that the army was ready to stamp out violent crimes in the state. He said the suspects had been handed over to the police for investigations and possible prosecution.

At the Umuobiakwa police station where the suspects were taken to, the Divisional Police Officer (DPO) refused comments.  The suspects had in turn been transferred to the state criminal investigation department (SCID), Umuahia.

-The Sun

Jungle Journalist Blogger poses with Senate Leader

Jungle Journalist Blogger poses with Senate Leader

This photograph shows Ofoelue ThankGod Onukwube, Blogger at Jungle Journalist in a pose with Senate Leader representing Cross River Central Senatorial District, Honourable Ndoma-Egbe Victor.

Suicide bombers attack Kaduna Churches, youths retaliate, burn mosques

Three churches were the targets of suicide bomb attacks this morning in Kaduna state.
According to eye witnesses, one went off at the Evangelical Church of West Africa (ECWA) church, Wusasa and another at theChrist the King Cathedral, Yoruba Street, Sabon Gari, Zaria.
The third church, Shalom Church at Trikania close to Abuja Flyover and Textile Labour house, was hit by multiple explosions around 10:17am.
Initial reports suggest that the Wusasa bomber did not reach the building because of security before the bomb detonated. Though casualty figures are not available yet, eyewitness accounts say there were dead and wounded at all three churches.
The explosions have sparked violence in Kaduna as youth retaliated, moving around with cutlasses and sticks among other weapons. Sources say the youths have burnt a mosque at Television area and another at Goningora was broken into and vandalised in retaliation for the attacks on the three churches. An eyewitness reported that the Goningora mosque was set on fire, thirty minutes after the initial vandalisation.
Men of Operation Yaki are said to have taken charge of the situation, especially around Goningora which is along the Abuja-Kaduna expressway and where Christian youths were beginning to get violent. An eyewitness said he saw four dead bodies near the Goningora mosque. Other trouble spots so far identified are Sabo, Trikania, Television area, Tudun Wada and Unguwan Rimi.
Road blocks have been set up at strategic areas and traffic along the expressway has been halted. Other areas of Kaduna metropolis are experiencing an uneasy calm.
The Abuja-Kaduna expressway links many states in the North to Abuja. Looters were also said to be on rampage, robbing the wounded and the dead. One however, met his waterloo when e made for the offering basket. He was lynched instantly inside the church by irate youths. More details later…

Breaking News: Again, explosion rocks Kaduna Church

The residents of Kaduna were once again thrown into pandemonium Sunday, 17th June when an explosion was heard in a church called Shalom Church in Tirkaniya area of the city.
Details are still sketchy but will be made available to you as they unfold.

Breaking News: Igbiniedion University under attack

Reports reaching us says that Igbinedion University, a private tertiary institution in Okada, Edo State, Nigeria is under
attack by unknown gunmen. The gunmen
suspected to be militant kidnappers are reported
to have arrived the school premises since 3am,
and have been matcheting people, destroying
cars and properties and have injured a number of
students and might have killed one. Gates to the
school have been blocked by the assailants and
as such there are no movements into or outside
the school.
Help is being sought from security operatives to
contain the situation before it escalates!
On June 8, 2012, the school authorities reported
that four students of the institution had been
kidnapped by unknown persons on the road
leading to the school. The students, all medical
students of the university have since been
released.

Abiola can never be honoured enough -Senator Victor Ndoma Egba

 

ImageRecently, the National Assembly completed another year in decision making, with several bills passed, but of course, with too many corruption scandals causing the nation a lot of embarrassments. In this interview with JUNGLE JOURNALIST, senate leader, Honourable victor Ndoma-Egba speaks on these issues, and goes a step further to comment on the ever-burning issues of MKO Abiola, June 12, and other national matters:

 

What is your candid assessment of the National Assembly, one year after?

 

Let me be more specific on the Senate. It’s been another year of stability. If you look at the history of the Senate from 1999 till the sixth senate, it has always ended on a note of instability. It was only in the sixth senate, with the coming of David Mark, which we took off on a note of stability, and again ended on that same note. In the seventh senate, we have again taken off on a note of stability. The implication for me is that the Senate as an institution is mature. In the sixth Senate, I don’t recall any scandal around the Senate. One year into the seventh senate, there is also no scandal. What it means is that our internal cleansing processes appear to be working. In terms of bills, our core legislative function is law-making, so it is right to be accessed on the number of bills you have passed, even though it is not usually the quantity of bills per se  that determines the output of the parliament. It is an objective way of assessing the parliament. In the last one year, we have passed 24 bills, which is the highest number ever passed within the same time frame. We have 126 bills under processing, which again is the highest in number. We have taken about 48 motions, the highest number within that period. It shows that as we mature, our systems get more productive and more efficient. We still have constraints, and the major constraints are capacity. It is historical, in that there were many years we had military rule during which the Senate did not exist. We have only existed before now at the mercy of the military. Each time they came back, we were dissolved, each time they gratuitously left, we were reenacted into existence. Because the military intervention were so often, we didn’t have the opportunity of regular growth. Our growth has been episodic, in interludes. So we didn’t have that opportunity which the other arms of government had. With or without the military, the executive existed. With or without the military, the judiciary existed. They made laws that tried to limit the jurisdiction of courts, but with time, when the judiciary found ways round those exclusion clauses in law, which means that they were maturing, they were responding. They grew in spite of the military, but we did not have that opportunity because we were not in existence. So our growth has been in episodes, but we are trying to catch up with the stability we have now. We also had the constraints of infrastructure. It was only in the seventh senate that every senator can claim to have a proper office. Before now, we used to be in the older building, and shared two rooms, and only one toilet for everybody.  But this is the first time we can say we are properly quartered in terms of offices. We have the challenge of hostile public perception. We were under military for about 30 years, which means that for those 30 years, out of 52 years of independence, the parliament did not exist, and Nigeria continued. So, for 30 years, people lived without us, and if you can live without us, that means you can live without us.

The implication now is that, whenever anything goes wrong, the first thing they say is ‘these people that we were living without!’ are the cause. We have been ascribed responsibilities that are constitutionally ours, and being held responsible for things that are outside our powers. One example is the notion that the National Assembly is responsible for Nigeria’s woes.

 Image

Nigerians believe that, with all the money that gets to you, there is nothing you people come up with as sign that you are indeed serving the people. What is your take on this?

Our budget is N150 billion, the national budget is N4. something trillion. About three percent of that budget is what gets to us. That includes recurrent and capital. It includes the salaries of members of National Assembly, salaries of the civil servants who are working in the National Assembly, service commission, our aides, includes our subscription to the international parliamentary associations, it includes the National Legislative Institute, N150 billion. It’s about 10 percent of what is alleged to have been spent on subsidies. So, even I terms of opportunities, with our budget at 3 percent, our opportunity for corruption is 3 percent. But it is that 3 percent that is the focus of everything that has gone wrong, nobody is interested I where the other 97 percent is domiciled.

Two, we talk about the jumbo pay. I keep a file of my pay slip- its right here. From the first day I came here, in have the file of my pay slip. What has happened as, as you can see, I am operating from an office, what am doing here is official. So if am given N10, 000 to buy stationery, the same that is given in the executive and judiciary, it is given there for that purpose, but my own N10, 000 is part of my allowance. If am given money to travel officially, its part of my allowance, but at executive and judiciary, its travel allowance.

Recently I was at a funeral service where the preacher was talking about what some of us do with our constituency allowances, and what others don’t do with theirs. Am not aware of any constituency allowances, I don’t know of any such allowance, but this was coming from a very knowledgeable and believable Nigerian. So the public goes away with the notion that there I some allowance called constituency allowance. I remember appearing on a TV programme and was talking about my pay- what you take home after taxes and everything is about N650, 000. Then a young man called me and asked, ‘what of the N40 million you receive every month for entertainment?’ I said that if I received even zero point zero five percent of that, it will show on my physique, because I will start by entertaining myself. But there is no such thing. The public out there has its own perception. With the kind of money they say we earn, there should not be a poor former senator. But I challenge Nigerians to show me a single rich former senator. We are looking at those standards- one different standard for the executive and a totally different one for the National Assembly. That is why, if you purchase one vehicle, it becomes the subject of the editorials. But go to one obscure agency- they can buy 100 vehicles, nobody notices it.

 Image

You have talked about achievements in the area of bills, you have also talked about perception challenges. Can you link these with the performance of your oversight function?

I have talked about capacity, and the implications of our capacity is far-reaching. An example is the budgetary process. You use processes, parameters when budgeting. The indices and parameters we use are the ones fed to us by the executive. We don’t have independent capacity yet like the United States that has a congressional budget office. Like they say, garbage in garbage out, even from the structural perspective, we have issues with oversight. The people you are oversighting are the ones you depend o for input. But what I have noticed, as an institution matures, you find ways round these issues. People talk about corruption in the senate. The senate has 54 standing committees. But the notion is that it is a pervasive thing. Every member of the National Assembly is seen as a thief. I remember one day I was taking my son to school, and there was this radio programme. It was painting all of us as thieves, brigands and armed robbers. I noticed that my son, who was  sitting by my side was shifting. I looked at him, and asked ‘why are you shifting? So you believe the story?’ he replied, ‘is it not true?’ I also remember when a colleague of mine, lawyer, came with my former principal who was in town. He called me over the phone, and said he would like to see me. I said he should come to the office. He reluctantly came to the office, and being a very small office, the connecting door was open and I was busy writing. They must have stood there for about three minutes without me noticing, because I was engrossed in what I was doing. He said, ‘you mean you people work here?’ I said, ‘what do you mean?’ he said that the impression they had was that all we do is to move ‘Ghana-must-Go’ bags all around. Meanwhile, it was budget season, and at 7 am, all senators at that season are very likely to be in the office. So he was shocked, but again, it was that same perception of the public. I go to church sometimes and the priests are so against politicians, though when they want to change the roof it’s the same politicians.

But we too are searching for salvation, hoping to go to heaven. We are also looking for God’s face like any other person. I am a catholic and I carry my chaplet in my pocket all the time. I am like any other person. I look at my colleagues and I know that 99.99 percent of them are truly patriotic Nigerians who are struggling to offer their best to Nigeria.

Most often, we see your colleagues exhibiting pictures of roads, street lights and other things they have done. They also call it constituency project. Who do we blame here?

No, no, let me tell you, I give scholarships. I have given scholarships since 1980, before the senate. I have professors today who were I my scholarship. I have bought cars for my constituents, it’s not from any allowance. Every project is a constituency project, because it is done in somebody’s constituency. What I am saying categorically that does not exist is a constituency allowance. Let me tell you how it operates. There is an office in the Villa called the MDG, headed by a senior special assistant. Now, that office will come up with parameters- we want to build primary schools, or we want to intervene in twelve centres I Cross River Central Senatorial District, and so on. If it’s my senatorial district, they will send me a form to show where they should be sighted. Then I will met with those representing these constituencies to ask, ‘please where and where are you sighting these projects so that we don’t duplicate?’ I now fill that form, an return it to the committee, which forward I to the office of the senior special assistant on MDGs. They  do the awards.  In Obasanjo’s time it was a taboo for you to even have a say who the contractor should be. They were warned not to go to any senator, and those projects failed, because you come to my constituency, in a place called Akparabong, which is not even as remote as the other places, some of those projects were sighted right inside, and the contractors were supposed to come from Sokoto to do a borehole of N3 million, and you expect it to work. We have had cases where a contractor is supposed to go to go to Buguma to do a N7 million project, and we said no, there are ways we can assist. We have this traditional notion of hospitality in my community.  If you are coming to do anything in my community, let me know, let me call the chiefs for you. Anybody who has one empty room I his house, he can offer it to the visitor. Even the materials he is bringing could be kept in the chief’s compound, so that he does not have to pay for security. But when you now say that we who represent these communities that are the beneficiaries of these projects’ are taboos, and should not even be told, the project is bound to fail. Yes, you have constituency projects. As a matter of fact, every project is a constituency project. Even if it’s the Abuja-Lokoja road it’s a constituency project because it passes through people’s constituency. So all projects are constituency projects, but if are talking about the MDGs, yes, we can influence where it is sighted, but you have no hand in the award of contracts. And I say again very categorically, that there is nothing like constituency allowance.

As a senator from the Niger-Delta, what would you say is the reason the Niger Delta has been calm all the while?

I think it is essentially what has happened and what the people of the Niger- Delta still expect to happen. You know government went into discussions with milt ants whose leaders were known, they went into a dialogue. The outcome is the amnesty programme. Certain promises were made, some are being kept, others we hope will be kept.

Why can’t this be extended to the Boko Haram people?

Do you know their leaders? Has anybody come to tell you ‘I am a leader of Boko Haram?’ in Niger-Delta, you hear ‘General this, General that, they had their camps, and I remember at some point, the present president and vice president even had to go to those camps to meet with them. They were known, and they owned up. They gave their reasons why they were involved. Nobody wants to come out and say, ‘I am the leader of Boko Haram’.

Back to the National Assembly, what is the relationship like between the upper and lower houses?

It couldn’t be better. The leadership of both houses has mutual respect for one another. There is also a level of consultation, which was something that was missing in the recent past. There is constant dialogue on those areas we need to harmonize.  When an issue comes up, I am I constant touch with their leadership, and they are also I constant touch with me.

So what accounts for those differences between the House’ and Senate approach to matters which are quite different, if truly there this harmony?

You know I made an exception that the consultation does not include how we do our work. You must be at least 30 years to be a member of the house, and 35 to be in the senate, which means you are likely to find older people in the senate than house of reps. Two, our number is smaller- they are 360, and we are 109. If we have 109 points of view, they have 360. A senator represents a stat, while a member of the house represents a federal constituency. What it means is that we have a broader outlook because we are structurally in a broader reach. They are more intense because their constituencies are smaller. Lastly, the lower house in a bicameral arrangement is designed to represent the people directly. The upper house is designed to stabilize the polity. Structurally, we are not supposed to join the fray, but stand apart. When there is a crises, we now move in to cam the situation. And you can see it, that when Yaradua had health challenges, it was the senate tat moved in with the doctrine of necessity to stabilize the polity. During the last strike, on the removal of oil subsidy, our approach was different, because we knew that we are expected to stabilize the crises at such points. So the two houses are conceptually different.

Does it bother you that each time, here is always this problem of bribery coming from the House of Reps?

The house has over 70 committees, how many are involved I bribe? Let me say this, of the three arms, the National Assembly is the one that operates in the open we are in plenary, committees, there are cameras. We are obliged to operate in the public because we represent the people. We have only tow situations where we operate in private- to discuss national issues and hosed keeping issues. I remember when one bullet-proof car was ordered, even before Ken Nnamani became senate president. It was the subject of many front page stories, it was the subject of an editorial. I went to the press centre and askd ‘look gentlemen, we may have erred here, but how many bullet-proof cars are the rain the Villa? Nobody could say. How many care do you have in your local government chairman’s fleet? Or in the judiciary? Nobody could say, but that one in the National Assembly was known. If you were to subject the other arms to the kind of scrutiny that the National Assembly enjoys, are you sure we will still appear as bad as we do now?

Do you suspect another arm of government deliberately setting up the House of Reps?

I don’t. I don’t see who will benefit anything if he National Assembly is discredited. Nigerians will lose, and I tell you this. I have talked about the long period Nigerians have got used to living without a legislature. Nigerian could do without a legislature, but the same Nigerians want democracy, and these institutions they could do without represents democracy. If we get mischievous of our National Assembly, we could end up with a timid National Assembly, and as timid National Assembly does nobody any good. It means the Executive can have a free hand to roll. I subscribe to openness in governance, I subscribe to openness even in our private lives. If you have nothing to hide, you will be open, and it is because of my very firm belief in openness that personally sponsored the Freedom of Information bill. It is today an act because I believe that society must be open. It is when the society is open that you will see us rise to our responsibilities and abilities. It is when society is open that you can elevate accountability, public discourse. I don’t see anybody benefitting from a timid national assembly. What has happened is that we are more open to scrutiny than any other person. If there is one instance of bribery in the national assembly, as open as it is, I bet you there will be thousands in those institutions that operate in closets. That is why I said that if you subject the other arms of government to the same scrutiny that we undergo, w may not be as bad as e appear.

Do you subscribe to the agitation for a Sovereign National Conference?

If you say sovereign, how do we set aside the constitution, for it to be sovereign, you have to set aside the constitution. And you need a military coup to set aside the constitution, and that one is unconstitutional. So I think a sovereign national conference I a constitutional democracy is a misnomer. You can say national conference. It’s okay. The national assembly does not object to as many Nigerians as possible, as many for a as possible, as many opportunities as possible to discuss Nigeria. We will encourage it, we will even provide an opportunity for Nigerians to do so when we start the present round of constitutional amendment. The public hearings are going to be extensive and very robust. If Nigerians want to go outside the national assembly to discus Nigeria, we will encourage it. It is their rights, it is guaranteed under the constitution, freedom of association and speech. We have sworn to uphold and protect the constitution, so we will uphold and protect every right that the constitution has given. But the one I don’t understand is when they begin to qualify it as sovereign. Where will the sovereignty derive from? Outside the constitution? If its outside it, are you going to set aside the constitution? When you say sovereign, we  might as well keep quiet, as it will be an exercise in futility.

When you have those discussions and debates, are you going to use the comments that come out of it?

We have always done so, we have never laid claim to a monopoly of knowledge or wisdom. If you notice, the lawmaking process inherently allows for public hearing, and we use the opportunity as generously as we can possibly use. Every perspective and insight is very useful in what we do here. Recently we received a submission from Olisa Agbakoba. We are debating it, we use ever material.

Should we expect a robust review of the constitution?

It’s not in our hands, because if you even look at the procedure for constitutional amendment, it also involves the state houses of assembly. Every proposed amendment has to be passed by at least two-thirds of the state assembly. The implication is that for amendment to be passed, Nigerians must have discussed it and passed sufficient remarks on it.

Image

Why do you think Nigerians are calling for the review of the constitution?

Are you satisfied with Nigeria as it is today? If you are not satisfied, we must discuss. If you are satisfied, you will think of how to even get more satisfied. The discussion, dialoguing, is a normal human activity. I was asked whether it is not a clash that the Southern states wanted the revenue allocation reviewed, and the north also wants the same, I said no, it is an agreement, that we need to renegotiate the fiscal terms of our union as a country. Everybody agrees we need to discuss, even with your wife, what keeps your marriage going is communication. So, there is nothing wrong that Nigerians want to discuss. They must discuss. It’s a right that is guaranteed tem under the constitution.

What is your take o the agitations for MKO Abiola to be posthumously recognized as a president of this country?

First of all let me say that Nigeria needs to honour Chief MKO Abiola. He deserve it, he earned it. The democracy we enjoy today may not have been possible without his contributions and sacrifice. He had the opportunity to say, ‘let me leave this thing and go enjoy my wealth. But he said he will die for it if need be and he died.  Abiola can never be honoured enough for as long as we have our democracy. I have listened to the argument about he being declared the present. I have no problem with that. The only problem we have is, when will we say his term ended constitutionally? If you are president you were president from this day to this day? That is a problem.

What about the issue of declaring June 12 national holiday?

I have absolutely no objections to that. Like I said, you can never honour Abiola enough, for as long as we enjoy democracy.

You have the privilege of having the Ikom monoliths in your constituency. What are you doing to ensure it becomes a strong tourist attraction for Nigeria?

The most I can do is to ensure that Federal infrastructure that leads to the place is in place. As I speak to you, the Ogoja Ikom Road, which was in very bad shape, is being handled with assistance from World Bank. That road is one the reasons I agreed to come to the senate. The moment I ensure that federal infrastructure that services it is in place, then we move to the next level.

 

 

HON PATRICK OBAHIAGBON’s REACTION TO DANA AIR CRASH

Image

Former house of Reps member from Edo State, Honourable Patrick Obahaigbon has finally reacted to the Dana Air Crash. This is what he said:
“We must halt this ludicrously lugubrious kakistocracy. We must demur against demuren (no onomatopoeic extrapolation intended). The quotidian stentorian atribilous ululation is abyssopelagic. The country is on a precipice of pocalyptic crepscule”.
MEANING: we must investigate and put aviation sector right, else we all die flying!

WHY I KILLED MY HUSBAND –Teacher Who Killed PDP Secretary

Image

The PDP secretary in Lere LGA of Kaduna State, who was to take in another woman today, was killed by his wife. She that she didn’t kill her husband because he planned to marry a second wife.

A-35 year old teacher in Kero village, Garu district in Lere local government area of Kaduna state, Mrs Janet Yakubu said she used a machete in cutting her husband, which led to his eventual death, because he was fond of beating her. She said it had nothing to do with his plan to take in another woman. Jafaru Yakubu, The PDP secretary in Lere, had concluded arrangement to marry a second wife today, but his wife, with whom he had no child, sent him to an early grave.

“I did not killed him because of our childlessness or because he was trying to take another wife. I used the machete I bought three weeks ago on him because he beat me up when he came back around 10pm of that Tuesday”.

She said penultimate Tuesday when her husband returned home “I was already asleep, I heard him talking on his top of his voice that I should wake up. Soon, he pounced on me and beat me up. I went outside our apartment and started crying.

“It was while I was outside that the devil asked me to use the machete I bought for my farm on him. I picked it and sneaked into his room even though there was no power supply that time, I stabbed him at different places,” she said.

After stabbing, she said she ran out and raised alarm that some strangers have attacked her and her husband. “After my action, fear enveloped me so I threw the machete into our soak-away; I ran out and shouted that some strangers have attacked us. So his family who are living around us came in.

“When they entered and saw the degree of the injuries he sustained, one of them pointed accusing finger at me. They took me to the police outpost and the policemen after interrogating me, followed me back to our house where they found the blood stained machete in the soak-away. It was at that point I confessed using it on him. My intention was not to kill him,” said Janet, who is a primary four teacher at the LEA primary school in Kero.

She said they have been together with her footballer turned politician for 16 years as husband and wife, adding that even though their 16 years marriage was not blessed with any child, her husband ignored all pressure from his family members to send her packing.

“Even though medical examinations have shown that our inability to bear a child was not from my side, my husband kept going round to get healing for me. In fact, early this month he got herbs for me and he told me of his intention to get another wife. Please help me to apologise to the family of my late husband, what I did was a mistake and I had no intention to kill him,” she said tearfully.

While expressing regret over action, Janet who hailed from Malagum village in Kaura local government insisted that she bought the machete not for the purpose of eliminating her husband but for her farm use.

Weekly Trust gathered that her husband who had deep cuts on his head, chest and three other places died at the Saminaka General Hospital as result of excessive bleeding.

Spokesperson of the Kaduna State Police Command, DSP Aminu Lawan said when the family of her husband saw him with many deep cuts on his body, they held her responsible. He said during interrogation she confessed killing her husband.

Mr Talata Yakubu, an elder brother to the deceased, said he was sleeping in his house around 3am when the late Jafaru knocked on his door asking him to come out.

“When I came out, he used a torch light to show me cuts on his head saying ‘see what my wife did to me.’ I saw five different cuts on his head,” Talata said.

Talata further said that before the incident Janet had bought a new machete worth N500 from the market in Garu. He said when his wife asked her what she wanted to do with a machete Janet said she wants to use it at the farm.

Another relative of the deceased and former councillor of Garu ward Hon Anthony Chindo said “We were the ones that went to bring her after their wedding at Mallagum, in Zangon Kataf, Kaduna State. I remember that time when Jafaru married her she only had a primary school leaving certificate but he sponsored her up to NCE level. That time I was the councillor of Garu ward and I helped her to get a teaching job at a primary school.”

Blessing Manchi Samson, whom the late Jafaru wanted to take as second wife. Blessing, who resides in Jengre, Bassa local government area of Plateau State, said “Janet has cheated me and the man’s family. We have concluded arrangement for our wedding. So when I heard the news, I was shocked. But I leave everything to God.” – Weekly Trust.

Whitestone, Producer of Clinic Matters launches The Benjamins

Image

Paul Igwe, the multi-award winning producer of Clinic Matters has come out with yet another debut comedy. Titled ‘The Benjamins’ , the TV sitcom is the story of the family of Prof Feyi Benjamin, his nagging wife and their children who know nothing better than get into trouble. Although a comedy, the show is also an educative show in which  viewers learn the rubrics of parenting and communication with children.

The sitcom is produced by Whitestone Cinemas, and debuts on TV Continental next month, precisely on Wednesday  4th July @ 9pm! Keep a date with The Benjamins.

NEWS UNBRANDED!

%d bloggers like this: